The meeting of the 2026 St. Louis County Special Board of Appeal and Equalization (the “Board”) was called to order at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, June 15, 2026, in the St. Louis River Room, Government Services Center (GSC), Duluth, MN, by Phil Chapman, Deputy County Auditor/Clerk of County Board.By Resolution No. 26-288, adopted June 2, 2026, the St. Louis County Board of Commissioners appointed the following members to serve on the Special Board of Appeal and Equalization:
John Vigen: District 1, present
Lynn Nephew: District 2, present
Sherri Puckett: District 3, present
Steve Abrahamson: District 4, present
Tim Peterson: District 5, present
Dawn Cole: District 6, present
James Marx: District 7, present
The oath of office was administered to each member by Deputy Auditor Chapman.
Deputy Auditor Chapman asked for nominations for Chair of the 2026 St. Louis County Special Board of Appeal and Equalization. Cole/Nephew nominated Tim Peterson for Chair; no other nominations were received. Abrahamson/Vigen moved to close nominations and elected Tim Peterson Chair by unanimous ballot. (7-0)
Deputy Auditor Chapman asked for nominations for Vice-Chair of the 2026 St. Louis County Special Board of Appeal and Equalization. Peterson/Nephew nominated Sherri Puckett for Vice-Chair; no other nominations were received. Peterson/Abrahamson moved to close nominations and elected Sherri Puckett Vice-Chair by unanimous ballot. (7-0)
County Assessor David Sipila was present at all meetings of the Special Board of Appeal and Equalization.
Hearing appeals start time: 10:04 a.m.
Case No. 26-02, Brad & Diane Williams, 4566 W. Lismore Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 660-6000-41600. The appellant felt the assessed value should be reduced because the parcel is a leased parcel from Allete Inc. and the appellant does not have the option to participate in the lease buyout program because the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has determined that the parcel is in a flood zone. The appellant commented that the assessment value should be reduced by 12% to 25%. Vigen/Marx moved to reduce land value by $41,500 due to the inability of the appellant to purchase the leased parcel. The adjustment resulted in a recommended total assessment of $132,500. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 10:25 a.m.At 10:28 a.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-16, James Jarocki, 2628 Branch St., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-2080-04140. The Assessor recommended a building value reduction of $3,300 due to corrections to the property record; resulting in a recommended total assessment of $1,447,900. The appellant provided the Board with a handout that summarized recent sales in the Condon area. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $1,447,900 due to recent sales and valuation comparison of nearby properties. Peterson/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-1, Cole)
The Board recessed at 10:49 a.m.At 10:55 a.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-13, Eagle’s Nest, Rachel Wexler, 6103 Lavaque Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcels 365-0010-04760, 365-0010-05005, 365-0010-05006, 365-0010-06032, 365-0010-06287, 365-0010-06288. The appellant provided the Board with a handout that detailed three parcels in which the Estimated Market Value (EMV) increased. The appellant felt the assessed value for parcel 365-0010-06288 should be $300; parcel 365-0010-05006 should be lowered to $336,400 instead of the proposed $337,600; Parcel 365-0010-06032 should be $25,000 instead of $28,600. The assessor commented that all parcels are valued as contiguous property. After further discussion, Peterson/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $842,200. (5-2, Cole, Marx)
Case No. 26-33, Keith Johnson, 2108 Swan Lake Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-0900-00090. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommendation to reduce total value by $7,900, due to corrections made during a recent inspection. The appellant provided the Board with two different estimates to repair the foundation issues for the building.Cole/Marx moved to reduce building value by $19,800 due to severe foundation issues. The adjustment resulted in a building assessment of $122,900 and a total assessment of $204,400. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 11:51 a.m. At 12:11 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-24, Greg Cullen, 325 Harbor View Dr., Rockwall, TX, appealing parcels 660-0010-050000, 660-0010-05046. The appellant provided the Board with an opinion of value handout and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $242,300. The appellant said parcel 660-0010-05046 should be valued at $11,000 because of the opinion of value report and the parcel is unbuildable.County Assessor Sipila commented that according to state statute, the county is required to assess the parcels as a contiguous property. John Vigen noted that the opinion of value was provided only for parcel 660-0010-05046 and did not value the parcels as a contiguous property.Vigen/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-17, Craig Johnson, 916 W. Minnehaha Pkwy., Minneapolis, MN, appealing parcel 010-4598-00050. The appellant provided the Board with a handout and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $599,500 due to recent sales for comparable properties. The appellant proposed a total assessment of $542,000. Peterson/Vigen moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 12:53 p.m.At 2:00 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present except Lynn Nephew. At 2:04 p.m., Lynn Nephew entered the meeting.
Case No. 26-12, Mary & Gary Moline, 202 W. Terrace St., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 375-0033-00370. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $798,900 because the 2026 estimated market value exceeds the actual market value, the property has been unequally assessed relative to comparable neighboring properties, and the land has been incorrectly classified. In addition, the appellant noted numerous discrepancies listed on the CAMA report. The appellant provided the Board with a handout containing various documentation. Puckett/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommended valuation of $798,900. (7-0)
Case No. 26-39, Gary Lofald, 3609 Decker Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-2710-07050. Lynn Nephew indicated that she would be abstaining from discussion and voting. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommendation to increase value by $119,700 due to an interior inspection resulting in corrections to the record. The assessor’s recommended total assessment is $1,006,000. The appellant provided the Board with an appraisal and said the property should be valued at the appraised value of $775,000.After further discussion, Vigen/Puckett moved to reduce value by $100,600 due to the property location; resulting in a total assessment of $905,400. (5-1, Puckett, Nephew abstention)
Case No. 26-21, John Stubenvoll, 4384 Normanna Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 375-0089-00010. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $1,169,200. The appellant provided the Board with a handout listing comparable properties and commented that they were unequally assessed because the valuation for every property on the list increased less than their property.The Assessor noted the appellant refused entry to allow for an interior inspection of the property.Peterson/Vigen moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-20, Guy Heide, 1812 Chinook Dr., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-0315-00170. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $720,300. The appellant provided the Board with a handout containing various documents. The appellant disagreed with the 14% increase in valuation and commented that the increase was done in bad faith because the Deputy Assessor did not take the oath as required by MN Statute 273.06. The appellant also questioned the legitimacy of the joint powers agreement between St. Louis County and the City of Duluth. In addition, the appellant stated that the Board has an obligation to determine if the property has been properly valued and has the power to correct the assessment if necessary. Assistant County Attorney Kristen Swanson commented that MN Statute 274.13 outlines the statutory duties of the County Board of Appeal and Equalization, and the County Board has delegated the duties to the St. Louis County Special Board of Appeal and Equalization. Issues related to statutory interpretations, contract interpretations, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief are outside the scope of what the Board can make determinations on; these types of issues should be considered at tax court or a civil lawsuit. Attorney Swanson said MN Statute 273.06 applies to individuals who are employed as deputy assessors and assigned, once appointed and ratified by a city or town, to a specific area; that is not the nature of the deputy assessors who are employed by the county; because of this, county deputy assessors are not required to take an oath.MN Statute 273.061 outlines oath requirements for county assessors and deputy county assessors; the interpretation offered by Mr. Heide is not supported by any authority in Minnesota; unrelated to valuation and outside the purview of this Board. Vigen/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-25, Douglas Fairchild, 127 E. Calvary Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 210-0010-06410. The assessor recommended classification change from 204-Non-Homestead Qualifying Single Res Unit to 151-Non-Comm Seasonal Residential Recreational. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $98,100 because the property does not have a well or septic. Vigen/Marx moved to accept the assessor’s recommended assessment and classification change. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 3:40 p.m. At 4:18 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-36, Kevin Lund, 4101 Colorado St., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-1120-05170. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommendation to increase value by $896,400 due to analysis using the most recent factors for the income approach; which indicates that the current estimated is too low. The assessor’s recommended total assessment is $1,896,500. The appellant provided the Board with estimates to repair building issues. Cole/Vigen moved to reduce the building value by $281,500 due to deferred maintenance. The motion failed. (0-7) After further discussion, Nephew/Puckett moved to keep the total assessment at the current assessment of $1,000,100. (5-2, Vigen, Cole)
Case No. 26-26, Zhihua Xi, 910 W. Morgan St., MN, appealing parcel 010-3812-00290. The appellant provided the Board with a market analysis handout and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $495,600 due to comparable sales. The appellant requested that the estimated market value be changed to $400,000. Vigen/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-11, Madeleine Patz, 202 W. Terrace St., MN, appealing parcel 010-2190-00080. The appellant provided the Board with a market analysis handout and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $340,800 due to comparable sales, deferred maintenance, and basement flooding issues. Peterson/Abrahamson moved to reduce building valuation by $53,100 due to deferred maintenance and basement flooding issues; resulting in a recommended total assessment of $287,700. (7-0)
Case No. 26-34, Lloyd Ethier, 1433 89th Ave. W., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 230-0050-00140. Tim Peterson indicated that he would be abstaining from discussion and voting. Steve Abrahamson and James Marx briefly stepped out of the meeting from 5:33 p.m. to 5:36 p.m. The appellant provided the Board with a handout and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $108,500 because the building does not have electricity. Vigen/Abrahamson moved to reduce building value by $5,000 due to the lack of electricity; resulting in a recommended total assessment of $103,500. (6-0, Peterson abstention)
Lynn Nephew exited the meeting at 5:54 p.m.
Case No. 26-35, Dean & Carin Jablonsky, PO Box 99, Maple Plain, MN, appealing parcel 010-2830-00150. The appellant provided the Board with an appraisal and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $688,300. The appellant stated their estimated market value should be $340,000 as indicated in the appraisal. Vigen/Abrahamson moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Nephew absent)
Case No. 26-38, Sarah Gibbons, PO Box 3586, Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 375-0070-00310. The appellant provided the Board with a property value estimate and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended assessment of $681,900. The appellant stated their estimated market value should be around $600,000 due to waterfront limitation. Peterson/Marx moved to change the lakefront classification to poor. The classification resulted in a $25,400 reduction of land value and a recommended total assessment of 656,500. (6-0, Nephew absent)
Case No. 26-44, Jal Bjorkman, 200 A Street Stop #301, Clear, AK, appealing parcel 230-0010-05590. The appellant agreed with the assessor’s recommendation to reduce total value by $61,200. The Assessor recommended a land value reduction of $56,500 and building value reduction of $4,700 due to land grading and frontage adjustments. The adjustments resulted in a recommended total assessment of $350,300. Vigen/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Nephew absent)
The Board recessed at 6:43 p.m. At 6:46 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-40, William & Adessa Bentley, 6 Minneapolis Ave., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-4680-00280. Dawn Cole briefly exited the meeting from 6:49 p.m. to 6:50 p.m. The appellant agreed with the assessor’s recommendation to reduce total value by $78,300. The Assessor recommended a building value reduction of $78,300 due to changes to the property record as a result of an interior inspection. The adjustments resulted in a recommended total assessment of $461,600. Vigen/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Nephew absent)
Case No. 26-29, Clarence Whelan, 1528 Drummond Grade, Brimson, MN, appealing parcel 230-0010-03950. The appellant agreed with the assessor’s recommendation to reduce total value by $18,000. The assessor recommended a land value reduction of $17,700 and building value reduction of $300 due to changes to the property record as a result of an interior inspection. The adjustments resulted in a recommended total assessment of $153,300. Marx/Abrahamson moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Nephew absent)
At 7:00 p.m., Chair Tim Peterson recessed the St. Louis County Special Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting.
On Wednesday, June 17, 2026, at 10:05 a.m. the St. Louis County Special Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting reconvened in the Liz Prebich Conference Room, Government Services Center (GSC), Virginia, MN. The following members were present: John Vigen, Lynn Nephew, Dawn Cole, James Marx, and Chair Tim Peterson - 5. Absent: Sherri Puckett and Steve Abrahamson - 2.
Case No. 26-5, Doug Coombe, 6244 Heldt Rd., Hibbing, MN, appealing parcels 755-0010-04690, 755-0010-04680, 755-0010-04650. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $412,500 because the incorrect acreage was listed on the report, dust from the nearby taconite plant, and the lack of county maintenance on his road. The appellant commented that the wrong message is being sent; people who take care of their property are getting taxed for improvements. Sherri Puckett entered the meeting at 10:18 a.m. The assessor commented that corrections were made to the record which resulted in a $65,400 reduction prior to the meeting and noted that the county does not consider mining dust as part of their valuation. Peterson/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Abrahamson absent)
Case No. 26-6, Wayne Dubbin, 6226 Heldt Rd., Hibbing, MN, appealing parcels 755-0010-04840, 755-0010-04655, 755-0010-04480. The appellant provided the Board with a handout summarizing various property issues. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $333,100 because 50% of the land is bog land and cannot be divided, there’s no timber on the lot, and the roof leaks. The appellant also questioned assessment values for his woodshed and other buildings on the property. The assessor noted that a value reduction of $1,200 was made prior to the meeting due to the effective age of the pole barn. Vigen/Cole moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Abrahamson absent)
Case No. 26-28, Home on the Range Corp., 237 E. College Ave., Westerville, OH, appealing parcel 370-0040-00120. James Ryan appeared virtually on behalf of Home on the Range Corp. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $442,000. The appellant commented that it was unfair to only consider the comparable sales approach and not consider other approaches such as the income approach; considering only the valuation approach contradicts Minnesota law. The assessor noted that residential properties are not valued on the income approach because typically residential homes are not sold based on income and there is a lack of market data to support valuation. Marx/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Abrahamson absent)
Case No. 26-31, Ryan Family Cabin in LLC, 237 E. College Ave., Westerville, OH, appealing parcels 370-0063-00091, 370-0063-00090. James Ryan appeared virtually on behalf of the Ryan Family Cabin LLC. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended valuation of $1,004,600 due to the county only considering the comparable sales approach and not considering other approaches such as the income approach; considering only the valuation approach contradicts Minnesota law. The appellant noted that he understands the county’s position based on his previous appeal and questioned why there was a difference between the indicated and sale values. The assessor noted that indicated and sales values vary because adjustments are made based on property attributes. Nephew/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-0, Abrahamson absent)
Case No. 26-32, Christian Murphy, PO Box 3611, Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 010-2420-01290. Christian Murphy appeared virtually. The appellant noted that an adjustment to reduce value by $24,500 was made at the local board of appeal and equalization and disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $297,000. The appellant provided the Board with an appraisal that valued the property at $275,000. The appellant indicated that all utilities are included for rental purposes on the property; whereas that is not the case for the comparable sales that were used. After review of the appraisal, Vigen/Puckett moved to reduce building valuation by $22,000; bringing the total assessment to $275,000. (6-0, Abrahamson absent)
Case No. 26-41, Terry Pogorels, 11297 Spudville Rd., Hibbing, MN, appealing parcel 0141-0020-00514. The appellant provided the Board with a handout that recapped property taxes for the parcel and area historical median prices from the Minnesota Realtors. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommendation to reduce building by $9,300; bringing the total assessment to $339,700. -Vigen/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (4-2, Peterson, Marx, nay, Abrahamson absent)
The Board recessed at 12:08 p.m. At 1:01 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present except Steve Abrahamson.
Case No. 26-19, Don Negley for Negley Properties LLC, 105 Central Blvd., Babbit, MN, appealing parcel 105-0080-00056. Dawn Cole indicated that she would be abstaining from discussion and voting. The appellant stated that he was not opposed to the assessed value of $656,900; he was concerned with the increase to property taxes and the impact on his renters. The assessor commented that the local board of appeal reduced the assessment from $656,900 to $475,000. The assessor requested that the board approve a total assessment of $656,900 because the building was purchased recently for $750,000. Vigen/Puckett moved to accept the assessor’s total recommendation of value of $656,900. (5-0, Cole abstention, Abrahamson absent)
Case No. 26-37, Aaron Pitrago, 4433 Carey Rd., Duluth, MN, appealing parcel 375-0053-00030. The appellant provided the Board with a market analysis report; the appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $1,064,800. The appellant requested that the property be valued at the market analysis valuation of $880,000. Nephew/Vigen moved to change the classification of the shoreland property from average to poor. The adjustment resulted in $131,200 in land value, bringing the total assessment to $933,600. (6-0, Abrahamson absent)
Steve Abrahamson entered the meeting at 1:50 p.m.
Case No. 26-9, Colleen and Aaron Cook, 146 Plymouth Rd., Malden, MA, appealing parcel 660-0025-00430. Colleen Cook appeared virtually. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $418,100. The appellant stated that the frontage measurement in the report is incorrect. The assessor reviewed the measurement and commented that the frontage measurement includes shoreline by the floating bog; the land quality was adjusted previously to account for the poor quality. Nephew/Marx moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-14, Jeff & Heidi Hill, 312 Mueller Ave., Buhl, MN, appealing parcel 115-0036-00200. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $398,900. Along with a letter, the appellant submitted a 2023 appraisal and a current realtor market analysis report. The assessor noted that the building value was reduced by $36,600 at the local board of adjustment.Peterson/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-10, Lake Vermillion Resort & Tourism Association, PO Box 159, Cook, MN, appealing parcel 270-0020-01570. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $34,100 The assessor noted that the appellant requested that the parcel be removed from the tax roll. Peterson/Vigen moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (6-1, Abrahamson)
Case No. 26-30, Michael Erjavec, 7547 N. Airport Dr., Eveleth, MN, appealing parcels 340-0010-02030, 340-0010-01960, 340-0010-01878, 340-0010-02010, 340-0010-02700, 340-0010-01872, 340-0010-01875, 340-0010-01879. The appellant agreed with the assessor’s recommendation to reduce building value by $6,700 due to an interior inspection resulting in an adjustment for the HVAC system; the in-floor heat is not connected and needs to be repaired prior to connecting. The adjustment resulted in a total recommended assessment of $781,600. Vigen/Abrahamson moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
Case No. 26-46, Nicole Carlson Wierimaa, 316 E. 25th St., Hibbing, MN, appealing parcel 140-0090-05220. The appellant said she is not appealing the current valuation of $89,100; however, she requested the Board provide her with a refund for previous years’ assessments. The assessor noted that the local board reduced the value from $116,800 to $89,100. Chair Peterson informed the appellant that the Board could only take action regarding 2026 valuations. After further discussion, Puckett/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 2:39 p.m. At 3:11 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-1, David J & Brenda L Franklin, 14523 Benson Rd., Grantsburg, WI, appealing parcel 387-0010-04008. David Franklin appeared virtually. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $18,600 because the property is full of boulders. Vigen/Abrahamson moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 3:24 p.m.At 3:46 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present.
Case No. 26-27, Carol Brown, 11897 Townline Rd., Hibbing, MN, appealing parcels 365-0010-06200, 365-0010-06190, 365-0010-06150, 365-0010-06140, 365-0010-06120, 365-0010-06100. The appellant disagreed with the assessor’s recommended total assessment of $361,500 because there is only road access to the front two parcels, the property contains a 10-acre beaver pond, and the property has 30 acres of wetland. The appellant also questioned why some of the parcels are valued at a higher rate. The assessor commented that all parcels are contiguous, which is a benefit to the appellant; parcel valuation is tiered which results in some parcels having a higher rate. However, the tiered rate for the contiguous parcels results in a lower overall value compared to valuing each parcel individually. Vigen/Nephew moved to accept the assessor’s recommendation. (7-0)
The Board recessed at 4:19 p.m. At 4:56 p.m., the Board reconvened with all members present except Lynn Nephew and James Marx.
County Assessor Dave Sipila presented a list of appellants who agreed no change was required and withdrew their appeal.Peterson/Vigen moved to approve the list as presented. (5-0, Nephew, Marx absent)
County Assessor Dave Sipila presented a spreadsheet of current year administrative changes.Cole/Abrahamson moved to approve the list as presented. (5-0, Nephew, Marx absent)
With no further appeals to consider, Vigen/Puckett moved to approve the following resolution:
COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION
RESOLVED, That the assessment rolls from the several assessment districts of the County of St. Louis, Minnesota, for the year 2026, to-wit: Cities of Aurora, Babbitt, Biwabik, Brookston, Buhl, Chisholm, Cook, Duluth, Ely, Eveleth, Floodwood, Gilbert, Hermantown, Hibbing, Hoyt Lakes, Iron Junction, Kinney, Leonidas, McKinley, Meadowlands, Mountain Iron, Orr, Proctor, Rice Lake, Tower, Virginia, and Winton; and Towns of Alango, Alborn, Alden, Angora, Arrowhead, Ault, Balkan, Bassett, Beatty, Biwabik, Breitung, Brevator, Camp 5, Canosia, Cedar Valley, Cherry, Clinton, Colvin, Cotton, Crane Lake,Culver, Duluth, Eagle’s Nest, Ellsburg, Elmer, Embarrass, Fayal, Fairbanks, Field, Fine Lakes, Floodwood, Fredenberg, French, Gnesen, Goodwill, Grand Lake, Great Scott, Greenwood, Halden, Industrial, Kabetogama, Kelsey, Kugler, Lakewood, Lavell, Leiding, Linden Grove, McDavitt, Meadowlands, Midway, Morcom, Morse, Ness, New Independence, Normanna, North Star, Northland, Owens, Pequaywan, Pike, Portage, Prairie Lake, Sandy, Solway, Stoney Brook, Sturgeon, Toivola, Van Buren, Vermilion Lake, Waasa, White, Willow Valley, Wuori and all the Unorganized Towns, as returned by the respective assessors and local Boards of Review, are hereby ordered placed upon the tax lists by the County for the year 2026.
YEAS:Vigen, Puckett, Abrahamson, Cole, and Chair Peterson - 5
NAYS:None - 0
ABSENT:Nephew, Marx - 2
At 5:06 p.m., June 17, 2026, Abrahamson/Vigen moved to adjourn the 2026 Special Board of Appeal and Equalization. (5-0, Nephew, Marx absent)